Most companies know they are supposed to “do inspections.” Somebody walks around with a clipboard, ticks a few boxes, maybe snaps a photo, and the form gets filed or uploaded. On paper, the requirement is met. But if you talk to regulators, insurers, or anyone who has investigated serious incidents, the story is different. They will tell you that weak inspection programs are one of the most common gaps they see when things go wrong.
In Canada, workplace inspections are hardwired into OH&S laws and guidance. Provincial legislation, the Canada Labour Code, and standards like CSA Z1000 and CSA Z1002 all lean heavily on regular inspections and hazard identification as core elements of a functioning safety management system.(Alberta.ca) The law expects more than a walk-around with a checklist. It expects inspections that actually control risk.
This blog looks at how to move your inspection program from “legal minimum” to “real control,” with a practical, Canadian OH&S lens. It also shows where a partner like Calgary Safety Consultants can step in to help you design and implement something that inspectors, auditors, and your own workers will actually trust.
A compliance-driven inspection program focuses on questions like: Did we inspect this month? Is the checklist complete? Did we upload the form?
A risk-control inspection program asks different questions: Did we identify meaningful hazards? Did the inspection trigger corrective actions? Did we verify that those actions were closed? Did the inspection data change how we manage the work?
Both programs may generate the same volume of paper. The difference shows up when something serious happens. Regulators and investigators now expect employers not only to have inspections, but to be able to show that inspections were tied to hazard identification, risk assessment, and control decisions. Resources from the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) are very clear that inspections exist to identify hazards and support corrective action, not just to satisfy a checklist requirement.(CCOHS)
Across Canada, OH&S officers and federal health and safety officers have strong inspection powers. In Alberta, for example, officers can enter most work sites without a warrant, review your documentation, interview workers, and issue orders if you are not meeting the OHS Act, Regulation, or Code.(Alberta.ca) Under Part II of the Canada Labour Code, federally regulated workplaces must support regular inspections and hazard control, and committees or representatives are expected to be involved in those inspections.(Canada)
When an officer looks at your inspection program, they are not just asking “Do you have a checklist?” They are silently grading you on things like:
If the answer to most of these is “not really,” then the program might be legal on paper but weak when a serious event is under the microscope.
Good inspections start with a solid understanding of your hazards. Standards like CSA Z1002, and many provincial guides, emphasize a structured approach to hazard identification, risk assessment, and control.(CSA Group) Inspections should plug directly into that framework.
Practically, that means you first map your operations: where the energy is, where chemicals are handled, where people and vehicles mix, where high-consequence tasks take place. You then design inspection routes, frequencies, and checklists that deliberately focus on those higher-risk areas.
For example:
A warehouse with heavy powered lift truck traffic should have frequent inspections focused on racking integrity, traffic controls, floor conditions, and pedestrian routes.
A small shop with hazardous products under WHMIS should have routine checks on labeling, Safety Data Sheets (SDS) access, storage compatibility, and spill materials.
A construction site should have focused inspections on fall protection, scaffolds, excavations, lifting operations, and energy isolation.
If your inspection checklist does not visibly mirror your hazard profile, there is a disconnect. A generic checklist might still tick the compliance box, but it will not deliver the risk control you are hoping for.
Inspection frequency should be risk based. Most legislation and best-practice guides talk about “regular” or “periodic” inspections, but they leave it to the employer to scale up or down based on the nature of the work.(ohsguide.worksafenb.ca)
Some areas might only need a comprehensive formal inspection quarterly, while others require daily or even pre-use checks. Examples:
Trying to inspect everything at the same cadence tends to water the program down. High-risk items get lost in a sea of low-risk observations, and supervisors stop taking the process seriously.
There is nothing wrong with a checklist. CCOHS even provides sample content and general inspection checklists to help employers.(CCOHS) The problem is how checklists are often used. A good checklist should be:
It should also make it easy to record evidence: photos, exact locations, equipment asset numbers, and risk rating. If every finding says “area messy” with no further detail, you will struggle to prioritize and follow up.
An inspection that finds issues but does not drive action is just a risk inventory. Real control comes from what you do after the inspection. Best practice OH&S management systems and standards like ISO 45001 emphasize corrective action, tracking, and review as critical pieces of the cycle.(Orderline.com)
You should be able to show, for any significant finding, the following:
This is where digital tools can help, but the process matters more than the platform. If supervisors are not held accountable to close actions, or if senior leadership never reviews inspection trends, your system will decay quickly.
Once your inspection program has been running for a while, you should have enough data to see patterns. Are you getting repeated findings on the same issue or area? Are certain departments consistently better or worse? Are your highest-risk hazards actually showing up in the data?
Trend analysis does not need to be complicated. Even simple counts by category, location, and risk level can show whether your controls are holding or slipping. When you see recurring issues, that is a signal to adjust training, supervision, engineering controls, or even work design.
A regulator or auditor who sees inspection data being used this way will usually have more confidence that your program is more than a paper exercise.
Most Canadian employers do not have time to build all of this from scratch, and they are understandably nervous about missing something important. That is where Calgary Safety Consultants can come in.
We can help you in several practical ways:
Because we work across sectors and jurisdictions, we can also “reality check” your program against what officers and auditors are actually looking at in the field. Our goal is to help you build a defensible, practical system that fits your size and risk profile, not a monster binder that nobody uses.
You can learn more or contact us directly through https://calgarysafetyconsultants.ca
A lot of smaller employers think that formal inspection programs are only for big industrial plants. That is not how regulators see it. Even small employers are expected to have some form of routine inspection and hazard control that matches what they do.
For a small operation, this might be a simple but disciplined structure: a monthly joint inspection of the whole site, plus quick weekly checks of high-risk items like ladders, chemicals, and powered equipment. For field-heavy work, it might mean site-specific inspections at mobilization and periodically through the project.
Calgary Safety Consultants can help right-size your program so it is not overwhelming, but still credible. That includes building inspection content and cadence into your COR or SECOR-ready OH&S manual and procedures, and showing you how to demonstrate due diligence during client audits and provincial inspections.
If you want inspection programs that actually work, there are a few traps to avoid. Relying only on one or two “safety keeners” to do all inspections creates blind spots and burnout. Treating inspections as a “gotcha” tool kills trust and reduces the quality of what workers will share. Flooding supervisors with low-risk housekeeping items can distract from real hazards. And perhaps the biggest one: never reviewing your inspection program to see if it is still aligned with how your business actually runs today.
Here is the blunt truth. Many inspection programs in Canadian workplaces exist mainly to cover the employer if something goes wrong. They are structured to say, “Look, we did inspections,” rather than “Here is how inspections actually changed our risk profile.” In my view, that approach is not only weak from a due diligence standpoint, it is also a missed opportunity.
Inspections are one of the few structured chances you get to slow down and really look at how work is being done. When you use them well, they become a feedback loop between workers, supervisors, and leadership. You learn where your procedures do not match reality. You see where shortcuts are creeping in. You catch design flaws, layout problems, and near misses before they become life-changing events.
If you treat inspections as a monthly compliance chore, you will get compliance-level results. If you treat them as a core risk control tool, build them off your hazards, and close the loop on actions, they become one of the strongest pillars of your OH&S program. In my opinion, that shift—from legal requirement to real risk control—is what separates organizations that just “have safety paperwork” from those that can face an inspection, audit, or serious incident with confidence.
Connect with us here and let us help you improve your OH&S practices.
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety – Effective Workplace Inspections
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/prevention/effectiv.html
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety – Health and Safety Programs
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/hsprograms/basic.html
Government of Alberta – OHS Inspections
https://www.alberta.ca/ohs-inspections
Government of Canada – Occupational Health and Safety in Federally Regulated Workplaces
https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/services/health-safety/workplace-safety.html
CSA Z1002 – Occupational health and safety – Hazard identification and elimination and risk assessment and control (overview)
https://www.csagroup.org/store/product/CAN-CSA-Z1002-12
ISO 45001 – Occupational health and safety management systems (Canadian adoption overview)
https://www.orderline.com/occupational-health-and-safety-management-systems-requirements-with-guidance-for-use-adopted-iso-45001-2018-first-edition-2018-03-with-canadian-deviations
Because a safer workplace starts with smarter policy. Let's build it together.
Formal inspections are a legal expectation across Canadian jurisdictions and are one of the main ways employers demonstrate due diligence, identify hazards, and verify that controls are working before an incident or regulator visit exposes gaps.
Frequency should be risk-based; higher-risk areas and equipment may need daily or pre-use inspections, while lower-risk areas may be inspected weekly or monthly, provided your schedule aligns with legislation, manufacturer requirements, and your actual hazard profile.
A compliance-focused inspection checks boxes and files forms, while a risk-control inspection links findings to hazard identification, risk assessment, corrective actions, and verification that those actions are completed and effective.
Calgary Safety Consultants is here to help you ensure compliance, enhance safety, and streamline your OH&S program. Don’t wait—fill out the form, and we’ll connect with you to discuss how we can support your business. Let’s get started!